
- Image via Wikipedia
If you had been given the chance to interrogate Diem during his rule in South Vietnam, you would have discovered that his thoughts, policies and eventual practices differed little from those of France. Diem had no intention of creating democratic rule. This is actually a place where American political clout shined for once as the US tried in vain to support to the backbone of Vietnam: the villages. Diem didn’t care. He ruled every detail of the country in his own image, handing small bits of power to his three brothers. The rest was a ruse. Democracy never got off the ground.
Several things can be learned from this lesson, one of which is an overused cliché but it fits all too well: Absolute power corrupts absolutely. If you happen to be a history nut, you have seen the act in this play a hundred times with the same end result. The total collapse of a society occurs with the villagers shaking their heads at the amount of energy and money spent on stupidity that creates destruction of the very things the powers were striving for: wealth and power.
Wealth and power are not tangibles and they are very slippery. The more you have the quicker they leave your hands. Grab for more and you are forced to drop what you had, losing your own stability in the process. In a hundred or a thousand years, the wealth and power always ends up back in the same hands once the empires fall: the villagers. No one seems to get it.
The United States has played the game both ways since its inception. Each U.S. presidency has its own agenda. Some are corrupt beyond description, with self-centered enterprises bringing down destruction on everyone’s heads while others try with desperate measure to shore up what was lost and give it back to the village again. Johnson was one of those presidents caught in the middle, trying to do both simultaneously. He had the military in one pocket and the villages in the other. Guess who won again?










